Gemma 4 26B-A4B (MoE)

Gemma 4 26B-A4B (MoE) needs 16.4 GB of VRAM at Q4_K_M with 8k context, computed from its config.json as checked on 3 November 2026. The smallest card that holds it has 24 GB, and the fastest desktop card that runs it, the RTX 5090, generates at most 569 tokens per second.

Updated

Parameters
25.8B, 3.8B active
Context
262,144 tokens
Licence
Apache 2.0
Released
March 2026
Config checked
3 November 2026
Needs
16.4 GB
At Q4_K_M with 8k context and an FP16 KV cache: 15 GB of weights, 0.4 GB of KV cache and 1.1 GB of runtime overhead.
Computed 3 November 2026
Smallest card
24 GB
Any 24 GB card holds it (RTX 3090, RTX 4090). 6.4 GB left at this setting.
Computed 3 November 2026
Fastest desktop card that fits
RTX 5090
At most 569 tokens per second, single stream: real runtimes land well below a figure this high. From memory bandwidth, not measured.
Computed 3 November 2026
Cloud hour for that card
$0.50 an hour
One RTX 5090 on SaladCloud, on demand before tax, or $1.19 on RunPod, which runs its own data centres. Every provider compared.
Read 19 October 2026

Open Gemma 4 26B-A4B (MoE) in the LLM checker

Which card size runs it

16.4 GB against each memory size. A model may use 95% of a card, and only what is left over, or missing, is coloured; tight means above 85%, with little room for a longer conversation.

  • 8 GB
    RTX 3070, 4060, most gaming laptops
    No
    Short by 8.8 GB
  • 12 GB
    RTX 3060 12 GB, 4070
    No
    Short by 5.0 GB
  • 16 GB
    RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB, RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB
    No
    Short by 1.2 GB
  • 24 GB
    RTX 3090, RTX 4090
    Yes
    6.4 GB left
  • 32 GB
    RTX 5090
    Yes
    14.0 GB left
  • 48 GB
    RTX 6000 Ada, L40S, A6000
    Yes
    29.2 GB left
  • 80 GB
    A100 80 GB, H100
    Yes
    59.6 GB left
  • 96 GB
    RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
    Yes
    74.8 GB left

Other quantisations, context lengths or a Q8 KV cache: the VRAM calculator.

Computed 3 November 2026

Which GPU to pick

The smallest card here that loads it at Q4_K_M with 8k of context is the RX 7900 XT (20 GB): 16.4 GB needed, an estimated 254 tokens per second. The same card still has room at 32,768 tokens of context (16.9 GB), so there is no reason to buy above it for this model.

At Q8_0, which is near-lossless, the card is the RTX 5090 (32 GB), needing 29.3 GB. On Apple silicon, a Mac mini M4 Pro holds it with 32,768 tokens of context at an estimated 87 tokens per second; prompt processing is slower than on Nvidia, which long documents make obvious. Among unified-memory desktops, the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 holds it at 32,768 tokens in 16.9 GB, at an estimated 81 tokens per second.

Speed on each card

GPUFitsEst. tokens/sFeels likeMemoryBandwidth
H100 SXM Yes ≤ 1,064 faster than you can read 80 GB 3,350 GB/s
A100 Yes ≤ 648 faster than you can read 80 GB 2,039 GB/s
RTX 5090 Yes ≤ 569 faster than you can read 32 GB 1,792 GB/s
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Yes ≤ 569 faster than you can read 96 GB 1,792 GB/s
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Yes ≤ 427 faster than you can read 48 GB 1,344 GB/s
RTX 4090 Yes ≤ 320 faster than you can read 24 GB 1,008 GB/s
RX 7900 XTX Yes ≤ 305 faster than you can read 24 GB 960 GB/s
RTX 6000 Ada Yes ≤ 305 faster than you can read 48 GB 960 GB/s
RTX 3090 Yes ≤ 297 faster than you can read 24 GB 936 GB/s
RTX 5090 Laptop GPU Yes ≤ 285 faster than you can read 24 GB 896 GB/s
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Yes ≤ 285 faster than you can read 32 GB 896 GB/s
L40S Yes ≤ 274 faster than you can read 48 GB 864 GB/s
RX 7900 XT Yes ≤ 254 faster than you can read 20 GB 800 GB/s
RTX A6000 Yes ≤ 244 faster than you can read 48 GB 768 GB/s
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Yes ≤ 213 faster than you can read 24 GB 672 GB/s
Radeon AI PRO R9700 Yes ≤ 203 faster than you can read 32 GB 640 GB/s
Arc Pro B70 Yes ≤ 193 faster than you can read 32 GB 608 GB/s
Arc Pro B60 Yes ≤ 145 faster than you can read 24 GB 456 GB/s
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Yes ≤ 137 faster than you can read 24 GB 432 GB/s
RTX Spark Yes 95 faster than you can read 128 GB (102 for the GPU) 300 GB/s
DGX Spark Yes 87 faster than you can read 128 GB (126 for the GPU) 273 GB/s
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 Yes 81 faster than you can read 128 GB (96 for the GPU) 256 GB/s
RTX 4060 Ti No - does not fit 16 GB 288 GB/s
RTX 5060 Ti No - does not fit 16 GB 448 GB/s
RTX 5080 No - does not fit 16 GB 960 GB/s
RTX 5070 Ti No - does not fit 16 GB 896 GB/s
RTX 4080 SUPER No - does not fit 16 GB 736 GB/s
RX 9070 XT No - does not fit 16 GB 640 GB/s
RX 9060 XT No - does not fit 16 GB 320 GB/s
RTX 3060 No - does not fit 12 GB 360 GB/s
RTX 4070 No - does not fit 12 GB 504 GB/s
RTX 5070 No - does not fit 12 GB 672 GB/s
Arc B580 No - does not fit 12 GB 456 GB/s

Single-stream decode, from memory bandwidth at 70% efficiency. Prompt processing and batching not included. These are ceilings, not measurements: Gemma 4 26B-A4B (MoE) reads only 2.2 GB of weights per token at Q4, so little that the per-token costs the formula leaves out decide much of the real speed. The 19 figures marked ≤ are where a real runtime falls furthest below the number shown. See the speed estimator for other quantisations and Apple hardware, or every card compared if you are choosing hardware rather than a model.

Computed 3 November 2026

Memory by quantisation and context

Quant4,096 ctx8,192 ctx32,768 ctx
Q8_029.2 GB · fits 32 GB29.3 GB · fits 32 GB29.8 GB · fits 32 GB
Q5_K_M19.8 GB · fits 24 GB19.9 GB · fits 24 GB20.4 GB · fits 24 GB
Q4_K_M16.4 GB · fits 24 GB16.4 GB · fits 24 GB16.9 GB · fits 24 GB

Weights at this quant: 15 GB at Q4. Every extra 1,000 tokens of context adds about 0.02 GB of KV cache at FP16, on top of a fixed 0.21 GB that the sliding-window layers hold once their window is full. Try other settings in the VRAM calculator.

Computed 3 November 2026

About the model

Gemma 4 26B-A4B (MoE) has 25.8B parameters with 3.8B active per token (mixture of experts). It has 30 layers: 25 use sliding-window attention over the last 1,024 tokens (8 KV heads of dimension 256), and 5 are global layers with 2 KV heads of dimension 512. The mixture-of-experts member of Gemma 4, spring 2026: 128 experts with 8 active plus one shared, 3.8B parameters read per token. Google positions it as the fast alternative to the dense 31B.

Text and images 262,144-token window Apache 2.0 March 2026 3.8B of 25.8B active

Reasoning. Configurable thinking modes, per the model card.

All 128 experts stay in memory; 3.8B are active per token. The parameter count includes the vision encoder; a text-only GGUF is slightly smaller.

Native context window: 262,144 tokens. Licence: Apache 2.0, a permissive licence. Weights published in March 2026.

Good at

  • Speed on a 24 GB card: it answers like a 4B model while holding 26B of weights.
  • Long context cheaply: 25 of its 30 layers are sliding-window.
  • Apache 2.0.

Watch out for

  • All 25.8B parameters must fit in memory even though few are used per token. It is fast, not small.
  • A mixture-of-experts model this sparse trades depth for speed. For the hardest reasoning, the dense 31B is the one Google built for it.
  • No audio input; in Gemma 4 that is the 12B and the E-series.

Similar models

The models that need about the same memory as Gemma 4 26B-A4B (MoE) at Q4_K_M and 8k, which makes them the real alternatives on whatever card you have. The context column is what each extra 1,000 tokens costs, and it is where models of the same size differ most.

ModelSizeNeedsPer 1k contextWindowReleased
Gemma 4 26B-A4B (MoE)25.8B · 3.8B active16.4 GB0.02 GB256k2026-03
Devstral Small 2 24B24B16.3 GB0.164 GB256k2025-12
Mistral Small 3.1 24B24B16.3 GB0.164 GB128k2025-03
Qwen3.8 27B27.8B18 GB0.066 GB256k2026-08
Qwen3.6 27B27.8B18 GB0.066 GB256k2026-04

See every model compared, which models fit on 8 to 96 GB, or the cheapest hour of every cloud card.

Questions

Can I run Gemma 4 26B-A4B (MoE) on a 24 GB card?
Yes, at Q4_K_M and 8k context it needs about 16.4 GB, which fits a 24 GB card with room.
How much VRAM does Gemma 4 26B-A4B (MoE) need at Q8?
About 29.3 GB at 8k context, or 29.8 GB at 32k. Q8 is near-lossless; use it when it fits.
What is the context length of Gemma 4 26B-A4B (MoE)?
262,144 tokens natively. Holding all of it at Q4_K_M takes about 21.6 GB, of which 5.6 GB is context.
Why does Gemma 4 26B-A4B (MoE) need so little memory for long context?
Because most of its layers do not keep a cache that grows. It has 30 layers: 25 use sliding-window attention over the last 1,024 tokens (8 KV heads of dimension 256), and 5 are global layers with 2 KV heads of dimension 512. At 32k tokens the context costs about 0.9 GB; if all 30 layers kept a conventional full-length cache, the same conversation would cost about 8.1 GB. That saving depends on the runtime implementing the sliding-window cache. llama.cpp and vLLM do; a build that does not will use far more.
How fast is Gemma 4 26B-A4B (MoE) on an RTX 4090?
At most about 320 tokens per second at Q4, single stream, which is faster than you can read. That is a ceiling worked out from the card's memory bandwidth, not a measurement, and at a figure this high real runtimes land well below it, because the costs the formula leaves out take a growing share of each token.
  • Architecture values from config.json in google/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it on Hugging Face, and its model card, checked 3 November 2026. Every figure on this page is computed from those values; check them before buying hardware for this model.
  • Estimates assume a single conversation on a card that is otherwise free. A desktop on the same GPU takes 0.5 to 2 GB.