RTX 5090 Laptop GPU
An RTX 5090 Laptop GPU runs 33 of the 40 open models tracked here at Q4_K_M with 8k context, computed on 3 November 2026. The largest is Qwen3.6 35B-A3B (MoE), needing 22.4 GB and generating at most 360 tokens per second.
- Memory
- 24 GB VRAM
- Bandwidth
- 896 GB/s
- Released
- 2025
- Availability
- Sold new
Open the RTX 5090 Laptop GPU in the LLM checker
What an RTX 5090 Laptop GPU runs, model by model
RTX 5090 Laptop GPU (24 GB) addresses 24 GB at 896 GB/s. Every model below is at Q4_K_M with 8k of context, the setting most people actually use. Once the 5% safety margin comes off, the card has 22.8 GB to spend: memory decides what loads, bandwidth how fast it answers. Both are estimates from stated formulas, and the VRAM calculator shows the working.
On this card a model fits at or under 22.8 GB, and above 20.4 GB it is tight: it loads, but there is little left for the conversation, and a desktop on the same 24 GB can push it over. Tokens per second are single-stream estimates from memory bandwidth; ≤ marks a ceiling real runtimes fall well below.
Computed 3 November 2026The model to actually run on it
Muse Glimmer 30B is the best use of this card: 18.7 GB of the 24 GB available, an estimated 36 tokens per second, comfortable for chat, and 131,072 tokens of context still available.
How this is chosen, since no benchmark is quoted: models are compared by size, a mixture-of-experts model counting at the geometric mean of its total and active parameters (a rule of thumb, not a measurement). The pick is the biggest class that fits with memory to spare and answers at 25 tokens per second or better, and within that class the most recent general-purpose release; coding and reasoning specialists are listed above but not recommended by default.
Qwen3.6 35B-A3B (MoE) is the largest model the card will hold, at 22.4 GB, but it is the wrong daily driver: filling 93% of memory leaves room for only 25,600 tokens of conversation. More parameters are not worth a context window that runs out mid-document. It is a mixture-of-experts model reading only 3B parameters per token, so it is the faster of the two at an estimated 360 tokens per second; what it gives up is the depth of a dense model that reads all of its weights for every token.
If quality matters more than parameter count, Gemma 4 12B fits at Q8_0 in about 14.2 GB. Q8 is near-lossless; a smaller model at Q8 often beats a larger one squeezed into Q3.
How much context actually fits
Model size is the question people ask; context is the one that bites. The KV cache grows linearly with the conversation, so a model that loads comfortably can still run out of memory halfway through a long document. On 24 GB, the context you get is whatever the weights leave behind, which is why two cards that run the same model can feel completely different in use. These are the largest contexts this card holds, at Q4_K_M weights.
| Model | Max context, FP16 KV | With Q8 KV cache |
|---|---|---|
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 131,072 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Nanbeige4.3 33B | 10,240 tokens | 21,504 tokens |
| Qwen3 32B | 9,216 tokens | 18,432 tokens |
| Gemma 4 31B | 30,720 tokens | 72,704 tokens |
Quantising the KV cache to Q8 roughly doubles what you can hold, at a quality cost most people never notice: Nanbeige4.3 33B on this card goes from 10,240 to 21,504 tokens. Capped at 128k tokens, or at the model's own native window where that is smaller, marked "model limit": free memory beyond that point buys nothing. Rows that hold far more context than their size suggests are hybrid, sliding-window or latent-attention models, which cache only a fraction of what a standard transformer does; each model page shows the working.
Where this card stops
The first model out of reach is Flint 40B-A2.5B (MoE): about 24.8 GB at Q4_K_M and 8k context, against 24 GB of usable memory. Dropping to Q3_K_M would need about 20.2 GB, which fits, though Q3 loses enough quality that a smaller model at Q4 is usually the better trade. Offloading the remainder to system RAM works and is ten to fifty times slower; it is a way to see a model run, not a way to use one.
Buy or rent
Buy it for a machine you carry or a small, quiet box, not for RTX 5090 speed: a desktop with the full card runs more models, faster. If the big models are an occasional need, renting a larger card for those hours costs less than either.
Where to buy: Olares One, from Olares.
To weigh it against every other machine for your own job (chat, agents, images or video), use the AI computer picker.
Retail prices drift, and a figure written today would be wrong within a month, so this page does not carry one. Put the figure you are actually looking at, with your electricity rate and your real monthly hours, into the build vs rent calculator. It returns the month owning becomes cheaper, or tells you it never does. Hours per month decides it far more often than the price does.
The honest take
The laptop chip sold as RTX 5090: 24 GB at 896 GB/s, which runs local models like a desktop RTX 4090, not a 5090.
It shares a name with the desktop RTX 5090 and little else that matters here. NVIDIA prints 24 GB and 896 GB/s for it, against 32 GB and 1792 GB/s for the desktop card: the same memory as a desktop RTX 3090 or 4090, read at about their speed. So 24 GB-class models fit and answer comfortably, and 70B models do not. It comes inside gaming laptops and a few small boxes such as the Olares One, and each maker sets its power limit, so two machines with this chip can run at different speeds.
What it is good at
- 24 GB holds what a desktop RTX 3090 or 4090 holds at Q4: 27B models with room for a conversation, 32B ones only just.
- 896 GB/s is close to a desktop RTX 3090's 936 GB/s, so those models answer at a comfortable speed.
- Blackwell: it runs the FP4 (NVFP4) image and video files that cards before the RTX 50 series cannot use.
What it is not
- Half the memory bandwidth of a desktop RTX 5090 and 8 GB less memory, whatever the box says.
- The laptop or box maker sets the power limit, so speed varies between machines with the same chip.
- 24 GB stops short of 70B models at Q4.
The thing people get wrong: The name. A laptop or a small box sold with an "RTX 5090" has this chip, not the desktop card. For running models, memory decides what fits and bandwidth how fast it answers, and on both counts it sits with the desktop RTX 3090 and 4090.
Compared with the alternatives
- RTX 4090: 24 GB · 1,008 GB/s · best fit Muse Glimmer 30B at ~41 tok/s. The card most local-model advice is implicitly written for.
- RTX 5090: 32 GB · 1,792 GB/s · best fit Muse Glimmer 30B at ~73 tok/s. The first consumer card whose memory bandwidth changes what is comfortable.
- RTX 3090: 24 GB · 936 GB/s · best fit Muse Glimmer 30B at ~38 tok/s. The value benchmark for local models, and it has been for years.
How it stacks up against the other personal AI computers, from the Ghost Core to an RTX PRO 6000 workstation: personal AI computers compared.
All 40 cards are compared side by side on the GPU index, and the same numbers from the model's point of view are on each model fit table. To check one specific pairing rather than read a table, use the can-I-run-it checker.
Questions
- Can an RTX 5090 Laptop GPU run a 70B model?
- Not at Q4_K_M in one card. Llama 3.3 70B needs about 45.8 GB at 8k context and this card can address 24 GB. Your options are a smaller model, a harsher quantisation with very little context, splitting across two cards, or renting a larger one for the hours you need it.
- What is the best model to run on an RTX 5090 Laptop GPU?
- Muse Glimmer 30B. At Q4_K_M and 8k context it needs about 18.7 GB of the 24 GB available and generates an estimated 36 tokens per second, which is comfortable for chat. If quality matters more than size, Gemma 4 12B fits at Q8 in about 14.2 GB.
- How many tokens per second does an RTX 5090 Laptop GPU generate?
- It depends entirely on the size of the model, because generating a token means reading every active weight out of memory. At 896 GB/s and 70% efficiency, this card produces an estimated 135 tokens per second on an 8B model at Q4, and about 360 on the largest model it holds, Qwen3.6 35B-A3B (MoE). Reading speed is roughly 5 to 8 words per second, so anything above 25 feels immediate. Treat 135 as a ceiling on 896 GB/s rather than a measurement; the higher a figure, the further real runtimes fall below it.
- Is 24 GB enough for running LLMs locally?
- It runs 33 of the 40 models tracked here at Q4_K_M with 8k of context, up to 36B parameters. The honest test is not the model list but the context: Muse Glimmer 30B on this card holds about 131,072 tokens before memory runs out.
- RTX 5090 Laptop GPU or RTX 4090 for local models?
- Both address about the same memory, so they run the same models. On speed, the RTX 4090 is faster: 1,008 GB/s against 896 GB/s, and bandwidth is what sets chat speed.
- Is the RTX 5090 laptop GPU the same as the desktop RTX 5090?
- No. NVIDIA prints 24 GB of GDDR7 and 896 GB/s for the laptop chip, against 32 GB and 1792 GB/s for the desktop card. Memory decides what fits and bandwidth how fast it answers, so for local models the laptop chip runs like a desktop RTX 4090 or 3090, not like a desktop RTX 5090.
- Memory: weights (parameters × bytes per parameter) + KV cache (2 × layers × KV heads × head dim × context × bytes for a standard transformer; sliding-window, hybrid and latent-attention models counted as they actually cache) + 0.5 GB runtime + 4% of weights. Full derivation in the VRAM calculator.
- Speed: 70% × bandwidth ÷ active weight bytes, single stream, no batching, prompt processing excluded. A ceiling, not a measurement: the 16 of 33 figures marked ≤ are where real runtimes fall furthest below the number, because so few weights are read per token. See the tokens-per-second estimator.
- Card specification (manufacturer figures): 24 GB, 896 GB/s; see NVIDIA's own page for this card.
- Model architecture values come from each model's published config; the self-hosted LLM guide explains what each one changes.