Qwen3-Coder-Next 80B-A3B (MoE)

Qwen3-Coder-Next 80B-A3B (MoE) needs 48.9 GB of VRAM at Q4_K_M with 8k context, computed from its config.json as checked on 3 November 2026. The smallest card that holds it has 80 GB, and the fastest desktop card that runs it, the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, generates at most 721 tokens per second.

Updated

Parameters
79.7B, 3B active
Context
262,144 tokens
Licence
Apache 2.0
Released
January 2026
Config checked
3 November 2026
Needs
48.9 GB
At Q4_K_M with 8k context and an FP16 KV cache: 46.2 GB of weights, 0.3 GB of KV cache and 2.3 GB of runtime overhead.
Computed 3 November 2026
Smallest card
80 GB
Any 80 GB card holds it (A100 80 GB, H100). 27.1 GB left at this setting.
Computed 3 November 2026
Fastest desktop card that fits
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
At most 721 tokens per second, single stream: real runtimes land well below a figure this high. From memory bandwidth, not measured.
Computed 3 November 2026
Cloud hour for that card
$1.69 an hour
One RTX PRO 6000 (the Server Edition clouds run) on RunPod Community, on demand before tax, or $1.80 on Nebius, which runs its own data centres. Every provider compared.
Read 19 October 2026

Open Qwen3-Coder-Next 80B-A3B (MoE) in the LLM checker

Which card size runs it

48.9 GB against each memory size. A model may use 95% of a card, and only what is left over, or missing, is coloured; tight means above 85%, with little room for a longer conversation.

  • 8 GB
    RTX 3070, 4060, most gaming laptops
    No
    Short by 41.3 GB
  • 12 GB
    RTX 3060 12 GB, 4070
    No
    Short by 37.5 GB
  • 16 GB
    RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB, RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB
    No
    Short by 33.7 GB
  • 24 GB
    RTX 3090, RTX 4090
    No
    Short by 26.1 GB
  • 32 GB
    RTX 5090
    No
    Short by 18.5 GB
  • 48 GB
    RTX 6000 Ada, L40S, A6000
    No
    Short by 3.3 GB
  • 80 GB
    A100 80 GB, H100
    Yes
    27.1 GB left
  • 96 GB
    RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
    Yes
    42.3 GB left

Other quantisations, context lengths or a Q8 KV cache: the VRAM calculator.

Computed 3 November 2026

Which GPU to pick

The smallest card here that loads it at Q4_K_M with 8k of context is the A100 (80 GB): 48.9 GB needed, an estimated 820 tokens per second. The same card still has room at 32,768 tokens of context (49.5 GB), so there is no reason to buy above it for this model.

At Q8_0, which is near-lossless, the card is the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell (96 GB), needing 88.6 GB. On Apple silicon, a MacBook Pro M4 Max holds it with 32,768 tokens of context at an estimated 220 tokens per second; prompt processing is slower than on Nvidia, which long documents make obvious. Among unified-memory desktops, the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 holds it at 32,768 tokens in 49.5 GB, at an estimated 103 tokens per second.

Speed on each card

GPUFitsEst. tokens/sFeels likeMemoryBandwidth
H100 SXM Yes ≤ 1,348 faster than you can read 80 GB 3,350 GB/s
A100 Yes ≤ 820 faster than you can read 80 GB 2,039 GB/s
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Yes ≤ 721 faster than you can read 96 GB 1,792 GB/s
RTX Spark Yes ≤ 121 faster than you can read 128 GB (102 for the GPU) 300 GB/s
DGX Spark Yes ≤ 110 faster than you can read 128 GB (126 for the GPU) 273 GB/s
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 Yes ≤ 103 faster than you can read 128 GB (96 for the GPU) 256 GB/s
RTX 6000 Ada No - does not fit 48 GB 960 GB/s
L40S No - does not fit 48 GB 864 GB/s
RTX A6000 No - does not fit 48 GB 768 GB/s
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell No - does not fit 48 GB 1,344 GB/s
RTX 5090 No - does not fit 32 GB 1,792 GB/s
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell No - does not fit 32 GB 896 GB/s
Radeon AI PRO R9700 No - does not fit 32 GB 640 GB/s
Arc Pro B70 No - does not fit 32 GB 608 GB/s
RTX 3090 No - does not fit 24 GB 936 GB/s
RTX 4090 No - does not fit 24 GB 1,008 GB/s
RX 7900 XTX No - does not fit 24 GB 960 GB/s
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell No - does not fit 24 GB 672 GB/s
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF No - does not fit 24 GB 432 GB/s
Arc Pro B60 No - does not fit 24 GB 456 GB/s
RTX 5090 Laptop GPU No - does not fit 24 GB 896 GB/s
RX 7900 XT No - does not fit 20 GB 800 GB/s
RTX 4060 Ti No - does not fit 16 GB 288 GB/s
RTX 5060 Ti No - does not fit 16 GB 448 GB/s
RTX 5080 No - does not fit 16 GB 960 GB/s
RTX 5070 Ti No - does not fit 16 GB 896 GB/s
RTX 4080 SUPER No - does not fit 16 GB 736 GB/s
RX 9070 XT No - does not fit 16 GB 640 GB/s
RX 9060 XT No - does not fit 16 GB 320 GB/s
RTX 3060 No - does not fit 12 GB 360 GB/s
RTX 4070 No - does not fit 12 GB 504 GB/s
RTX 5070 No - does not fit 12 GB 672 GB/s
Arc B580 No - does not fit 12 GB 456 GB/s

Single-stream decode, from memory bandwidth at 70% efficiency. Prompt processing and batching not included. These are ceilings, not measurements: Qwen3-Coder-Next 80B-A3B (MoE) reads only 1.7 GB of weights per token at Q4, so little that the per-token costs the formula leaves out decide much of the real speed. The 6 figures marked ≤ are where a real runtime falls furthest below the number shown. See the speed estimator for other quantisations and Apple hardware, or every card compared if you are choosing hardware rather than a model.

Computed 3 November 2026

Memory by quantisation and context

Quant4,096 ctx8,192 ctx32,768 ctx
Q8_088.5 GB · fits 96 GB88.6 GB · fits 96 GB89.2 GB · fits 96 GB
Q5_K_M59.5 GB · fits 80 GB59.6 GB · fits 80 GB60.2 GB · fits 80 GB
Q4_K_M48.8 GB · fits 80 GB48.9 GB · fits 80 GB49.5 GB · fits 80 GB

Weights at this quant: 46.2 GB at Q4. Every extra 1,000 tokens of context adds about 0.025 GB of KV cache at FP16, on top of a fixed 0.08 GB of recurrent state that does not grow. Try other settings in the VRAM calculator.

Computed 3 November 2026

About the model

Qwen3-Coder-Next 80B-A3B (MoE) has 79.7B parameters with 3B active per token (mixture of experts). It has 48 layers, of which only 12 are full attention (2 KV heads of dimension 256) and keep a cache that grows with the conversation; the other 36 are Gated DeltaNet linear-attention layers with a small fixed state. Alibaba's coding-agent model, early 2026: 80B of weights across 512 experts, with 3B read per token. Built for coding agents and local development, and designed to plug into CLI and IDE tools.

Text only 262,144-token window Apache 2.0 January 2026 3B of 79.7B active

Reasoning. Non-thinking only: it answers directly and never emits reasoning blocks.

All 512 experts stay in memory; 3B are active per token, so it answers like a small model once it is loaded.

This is a coding model, tuned for writing and editing code and for agentic tools that read whole repositories, which is where a long context earns its memory.

Native context window: 262,144 tokens. Licence: Apache 2.0, a permissive licence. Weights published in January 2026. It follows Qwen2.5 Coder 32B.

Good at

  • A coding agent that answers at small-model speed, on an 80 or 96 GB card or a large-memory Mac.
  • Repository-scale context: a 262,144-token window with 12 cache-growing layers out of 48.
  • Agent loops, where no thinking preamble means no wasted tokens per step.

Watch out for

  • It is the memory that costs, not the compute. It does not fit a 48 GB card at Q4.
  • A specialist. It is not the model for general conversation.
  • The hybrid layers need a current runtime.

Similar models

The models that need about the same memory as Qwen3-Coder-Next 80B-A3B (MoE) at Q4_K_M and 8k, which makes them the real alternatives on whatever card you have. The context column is what each extra 1,000 tokens costs, and it is where models of the same size differ most.

ModelSizeNeedsPer 1k contextWindowReleased
Qwen3-Coder-Next 80B-A3B (MoE)79.7B · 3B active48.9 GB0.025 GB256k2026-01
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B (MoE)74.9B · 9B active45.9 GB0.008 GB256k2026-10
DeepSeek-R1 Distill Llama 70B70.6B45.8 GB0.328 GB128k2025-01
Llama 3.3 70B70.6B45.8 GB0.328 GB128k2024-12
gpt-oss 120B117B · 5.1B active71.4 GB0.037 GB128k2025-08

See every model compared, which models fit on 8 to 96 GB, or the cheapest hour of every cloud card.

Questions

Can I run Qwen3-Coder-Next 80B-A3B (MoE) on a 24 GB card?
Not comfortably. At Q4_K_M and 8k context it needs about 48.9 GB. The smallest tier that fits is 80 GB.
How much VRAM does Qwen3-Coder-Next 80B-A3B (MoE) need at Q8?
About 88.6 GB at 8k context, or 89.2 GB at 32k. Q8 is near-lossless; use it when it fits.
What is the context length of Qwen3-Coder-Next 80B-A3B (MoE)?
262,144 tokens natively. Holding all of it at Q4_K_M takes about 55.1 GB, of which 6.5 GB is context.
Why does Qwen3-Coder-Next 80B-A3B (MoE) need so little memory for long context?
Because most of its layers do not keep a cache that grows. It has 48 layers, of which only 12 are full attention (2 KV heads of dimension 256) and keep a cache that grows with the conversation; the other 36 are Gated DeltaNet linear-attention layers with a small fixed state. At 32k tokens the context costs about 0.9 GB; if all 48 layers kept a conventional full-length cache, the same conversation would cost about 3.2 GB.
How fast is Qwen3-Coder-Next 80B-A3B (MoE) on an RTX 4090?
It does not fit a 4090 at Q4 and 8k context, so speed would collapse to CPU offloading. Use a larger card or a smaller quantisation.
  • Architecture values from config.json in Qwen/Qwen3-Coder-Next on Hugging Face, and its model card, checked 3 November 2026. Every figure on this page is computed from those values; check them before buying hardware for this model.
  • Estimates assume a single conversation on a card that is otherwise free. A desktop on the same GPU takes 0.5 to 2 GB.